https://t.co/tHVcEMb4nv
Affected by this interview video
Women's and men's dating-market treatment are worlds apart
Don't blame her for ignoring you, slow to reply
too many options
If men had the same choice set, they'd act the same
Enjoying chase, admiration, neediness from multiple of the opposite sex
while 1v1 romance is too much trouble, low return
Easy to derive:
women don't reject multi-person ambiguity—they're beneficiaries of it
Women prefer men in demand
If she realizes you're only choosing her
she loses interest
Emotional value from ambiguity ties heavily to chat impression scores
If a topic scores ~60 emotional value
she'd rather find someone else for an 80
So when men sense the vibe is off, continuing costs points
Not replying is correct. Rambling loses points.
Instant reply / always available also loses points.
Also a choice-set problem.
Notice: most of the time the last chat message is from the simp.
The upper party decides when chat ends.
Women are born upper parties—too many choices, why be polite, why bother with you?
The more eager the reply, the clearer the signal—why make trouble for yourself?
Admiring strength is genetic
Leadership, presence, male charm beat money
Spending on her actually lowers interest
Men are gatekeepers of relationship
Women are gatekeepers of sex
Women can dangle sleeping together to string lower parties
Men use the romantic relationship
